A Critical Analysis of Dushta-vyadha: Defective Venesection Based on Sushruta Samhita
Author : Dr. Nikita Bankoti and Dr. Anmol Mahajan
Abstract :
Background: Siravedha, also known as venesection or bloodletting, has a long history dating back thousands of years. It’s a therapeutic procedure that requires precision to avoid complications. Dushta-vyadha, or defective venesection, can lead to various adverse outcomes. Acharya Sushruta mentioned 20 types of Dushta-vyadha. This study aims to critically analyze the causes, symptoms and management of Dushta-vyadha to provide insights on its implications and prevention strategies.
Methods: A comprehensive review of Sushruta Samhita and other Ayurvedic texts and articles was conducted to gather information on Dushta-vyadha and its etiology, clinical features, and therapeutic approach.
Results: The study reveals that Dushta-vyadha can result from various factors including patient-related factors, improper technique or equipment issues, leading to complications like hemorrhage, hematoma and infection etc. The symptoms of Dushta-vyadha include excessive bleeding, pain, swelling, and other complications. Acharya Sushruta emphasizes the importance of proper training, meticulous techniques, and patient selection, pre- and post-procedure care to prevent Dushta-vyadha.
Discussion: This critical analysis highlights the significance of understanding Dushta-vyadha in the context of venesection and discuss its relevance in modern medical practice. By adhering to the principles and guidelines outlined in Sushruta Samhita, health care professionals can minimize the risks associated with venesection and ensure safe and effective treatment. The study provides valuable insights for Surgeons, practitioners, researchers, scholars and healthcare sector and underscoring the traditional knowledge with modern medical practices.
Keywords :
Dushta-vyadha, Siravedha, Venesection.
